9/11
The Day That Changed America Forever
The New Pearl Harbor
9/11 The Truth Revealed
This page is dedicated to the victims who
lost their lives on 9/11 and the people who lost their lives of the aftermath of the attacks.
September 11th, 2001. An event and a day many will never forget. However, for a growing population this event did not occur as many said it did. More and more people don't accept the story given by officials and me included. We are awake and there is a different truth behind the attacks of 9/11 that I will explain below
The Power of The Global Cult.In the year 2000, The Project for the
New American Century was created. A think thank; The road to 9/11.
The terrorist attacks on 9/11 where from the start very unreal and supsicious described as the 'official story'. How could the American government know who had done it while the attacks where still unfolding that day? How could they have known on the same day of 9/11 that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda where the ones behind the attack without doing any investigation and without any proof?
Every espect of 9/11 is full of lies and different then we are being told. The truth supressed about what really happend that awful day. We will look at the most suspicious events that happend on that terrible day in September 2001.
Facts & Circumstances
Building WTC - 7
The collapse of building 7 // WTC - 7 on September 11th, 2001. A controlled demolition.
The mysterious collapse of the relatively undamaged Salomon Brothers Building (WTC-7), seven hours after the Twin Towers collapsed, is one of the main pillars of suspicion about the US government's involvement on 9/11. This was followed closely by the rapid collapse of the Twin Towers, the glaring failure of the Air Force and the impact on the Pentagon.
At 5.25 pm, WTC 7 suddenly collapsed to the ground in seconds. Like the Twin Towers earlier that day, this building with 47-stores and 173.74-meter-high building crumbles in a perpendicular fall, as if all the supporting structures had suddenly disappeared. Building 7 was completed in 1987 and housed a series of secret and semi-secret services. The Security and Exchange Commission has hosted thousands of investigations into illegal money transfers on Wall Street, including those of Worldcom and Enron.
Some names of organizations in the building:
-
IRS - Regional Counsil DOD
-
Department of Defense USSS
-
United States Secret Service SEC
-
Securities and Exchange Commission (mighty stock market watchdog)
-
OEM - Mayor's Office of Emergency Management
-
CIA - Central Intelligence Agency (Includes a secret office, located under another undisclosed name)
WTC 7 with the twin towers before the attacks.
This 23rd floor office had been renovated two years earlier for $ 13 million and had its own air and water supply. Bullet and bomb-resistant windows could withstand gusts of wind of 300 km / h. WTC-7 was the most distant building on the WTC site from the Twin Towers. After the towers collapsed, a number of fires raged in WTC-7, which after a short time had passed their peak, were not extinguished and stabilized over the course of the day into manageable fires. In one day there was a threefold of events never happend before. First. WTC 1, 2 and 7 completely collapsed after extreme heat and weakness of the tructure of the building. WTC 7 was not hit by an airplane. Never before did a skyscraper with steel construction collapse (completely) after a fire, not even after prolonged fierce fires. Despite a controversial report, FEMA reports words to the same effect.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency):
"The collapse of these structures is particularly significant in that, prior to these events, no protected steel-frame structure, the most common form of large commercial construction in the United States, had ever experienced a fire-induced collapse. Thus, these events may highlight new building vulnerabilities, not previously believed to exist."
There is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7.
It doesn't make sense how the Twin Towers and building 7 collapsed in the way it did. Neither before nor since 9/11 have fires caused the total collapse of a high steel-framed skyscraper. The official story is that building 7 collapsed because of fires which weakend the building. But this doesn't make any sense with how the building collapsed nor with footage of that day. the only phenomenon capable of collapsing such buildings completely has been by way of a procedure known as controlled demolition, whereby explosives or other devices are used to bring down a structure intentionally. The fires were on the upper floors, there’s little chance the heat would have spread down and caused the steel The WTC 7 building was treated with a fire retardant which would have insulated the fires. When the structures did fail they did so with such explosive force that pulverized concrete was blown away at high speed and scattered on a debris field some 370 metres away.
The most probable explanation is a controlled explosion and mostly likely using thermite, adding in the case of WTC 7 some 67 per cent of the supporting steel strength in Column 79 — pinpointed as the cause of the fatal collapse, would have to be lost before it failed and that would mean temperatures of 660 C. The paper also notes sprinkler systems would have reduced heat factors, while the overall design of the steel structure would isolate any failure and prevent a domino-effect collapse. The NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) however maintains the heat factor triggered an expansion in floor beams, pushing them off their seats and causing the collapse when other components also failed due to thermal expansion.
The evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition,” they conclude “Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.
BBC Reported Collapse WTC - 7 Before Actual Collapse
On February 26, 2007, an amazing excerpt from the BBC archive surfaced on GoogleVideo. The file was deleted by Google after several hours. In that short time, however, the file had been copied so frequently that it appeared on YouTube and Prisonplanet.com the same day. The material is an extensive BBC account of the collapse of WTC 7, made on September 11, 2001. Nothing special, were it not for the fact that the collapse of this almost intact government building would only take place 26 minutes later. The mainstream media already knew that WTC - 7 would collapse. The authentic existence of the images is not denied by the BBC.
BBC's Jane Standley reports collapse of World Trade Center 7, 26 minutes too early.
During the BBC report, the enormous building is visible as part of the already changed skyline. There is a huge gap where the Twin Towers once stood. The reporter sees the hole for the place where WTC-7 should have been. The collapse of WTC-7 was reported in image text as follows: "The 47 storey Salomon Brothers Building close to the World Trade Center has also collapsed." At one point, the connection with the reporter at the BBC is lost. Had the connection not been broken, the building in question would have collapsed after five minutes (exactly to the right of her face).
This video provides a witness who was near WTC - 7 on 9/11 and he described the scene where firemen and police cleared the area because 'something was going to happen'. A building was going to be demolished but the public wasn't told wich building. This witness saw a person with a radio and heard a countdown. Minutes later he heard a big explosion and WTC - 7 was put down. Take note of the footage from 9/11 where the Twin Towers are burning, where a demolition truck with a picture of the Twin Towers is seen s flew blocks away from the attacks. Why was this demolition truck there? Building 7 was definitely demolished with explosives.
One of the Manhattan Demolition trucks with a picutre of Manhatten and the Twin Towers.
Fall Of The Twin Towers
According to investigations conducted by American authorities show that the Twin Towers and WTC-7 collapsed due to a combination of fire and (impact) damage. WTC-1 was hit first and fell last. The plane crashed between the 93rd and 98th floors. At WTC-2 this happened 17 minutes later between the 78th and 82nd floors. Each tower had 110 floors over a length of approximately 415 meters. WTC-7 was not hit by a plane. That in WTC-2 there were controllable fires is evident from, among other things, recordings of radio traffic between the rescue workers involved. Orio Palmer and Ronald Bucca reached the 78th floor of WTC-2 at 9:52 AM. That was the low end of Flight 175's impact zone. Both men are still several floors from the level where the collapse begins minutes later (9:59 am). Palmer tells firefighter Joseph Leavey over the radio, "We have two insulated fires here. We must be able to extinguish them with two lines." The experienced rescuers show no signs of fear about an imminent disaster.
-
On August 12, 2005, after a lawsuit by eight relatives against the New York City Council, large amounts of material including two-way radio between rescue workers were first released.
-
Rescue workers came to trade center 78th floor as heared in video below:
Let Me Know When You See Fire - Firefighters in the South Tower on 78th floor WTC 2.
Before September 11th, 2001. The skyline of New York City with the Twin Towers in sight.
8:46:40: Flight 11 crashes into the north face of the North Tower (1 WTC) of the World Trade Center, between floors 93 and 99. The aircraft enters the tower intact. Footage Of The First Attack On The North Tower on the morning of 9/11.
World Trade Center 1 after being hit by a plane with explosives. In this fragment you see the first group of firemen entering the lobby of WTC 1; and as you can see, 'something happend in the lobby'. All the windows and the walls are completely destroyed.
Explosions in the Twin Towers. A Fragment from Loose Change; The Second Edition.
Witnesses & News Outlets Reported Explosions on 911 (Part 1)
Witnesses & News Outlets Reported Explosions on 911 (Part 2)
Rare Amateur 9/11 Footage with audio NOT SHOWN IN MAINSTREAM MEDIA.
You see smoke coming from the lobby of the Twin Towers AFTER planes hit the building.
Explosives and squibs are seen.
Timeline of the terroristic events on 9/11
(There were no passengers on these 'hijacked planes' as the planes were millitary)
7:59 a.m.: Norad ((North American Aerospace Defense Command) is practising wargames specifically about terrorism that morning of 9/11. Therefore, all F-16's that are normally available to protect te country where being flown to the other side of the country (planes being hijacked as an exersize and planes flying in Pentagon) American Airlines Flight 11, a Boeing 767 with no passengers on board (as it was a millitary plane and was switched with the flight name an numbers of the real flight 11) takes off 14 minutes late from Logan International Airport in Boston, bound for Los Angeles International Airport. There were no hijackers are aboard. The militiary plane was grey without much windows, was loaded with missles and was controlled from a distance.
8:14: United Airlines Flight 175, a Boeing 767, military plane, dark, without windows, departs 14 minutes late from Logan International Airport in Boston, bound for Los Angeles International Airport. Airplane was controlled from a distance, no people were on board of this plane.
8:14: Flight 11 was not really hijacked as there where multiple wargames being practised that day by Norad (North American Aerospace Defense Command - is a combined organization of the United States and Canada that provides aerospace warning, air sovereignty, and protection for Northern America) The wargames were specificly focused on terroristic attacks like planes being hijacked and a plane flying in the Petagon. This happened on the morning of 9/11. People working on these planes who where about to board, where told a script of a hijacking.You clearly hear it's a script being told if you listen to the taped telephone conversations on the day of the attacks. You hear no screaming, no background noises, not much emotions (only on some moments) of the victims reporting the so called 'hijacking', no Arabic, no panick. Most likely these employees had no clue what was going on, they thought they where playing in an exersize of a hijacking. They had to read what was in the script to 'create the telephone calls' or creating evidence. The employees had to act and to the best to play as if the hijacking was real and full of chaos when they where in the air. All that time the telephone conversations where recorded on purpose, they where on the ground, not in the so called 'hijacked airplanes'. The employees and the civilians who were suppose to be on these flights where murdered on a different location. The real flights where changed with militiary planes that flew to New York City and other locations. The Air traffic control had no idea how many planes were really flying and which planes were part of an hijacking exersize. Why did the Air traffic control didn't do anything to prevent those four flights accesing their goal? Why they did the Air Traffic Control watch the planes from beginning to end without any interference of F-16's?) Flight 11 flies to central Massachusetts, turning first northwest, then south.
8:20: American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757, departs 10 minutes late from Washington Dulles International Airport, for Los Angeles International Airport.
8:42: United Airlines Flight 93, a Boeing 757, departs 42 minutes late from Newark International Airport, bound for San Francisco International Airport.
8:42–8:46 (approx.): Flight 175 flies above northwest New Jersey, about 60 miles northwest of New York City, continuing southwest briefly before turning back to the northeast.
8:46:40: Flight 11 crashes into the north face of the North Tower (1 WTC) of the World Trade Center, between floors 93 and 99 with missiles and explosives. The aircraft enters the tower intact.
8:50–8:54 (approx.): Flight 77 is hijacked above southern Ohio, turning to the southeast.
9:02:57: Flight 175 crashes into the south face of the South Tower (2 WTC) of the World Trade Center, between floors 77 and 85 with missiles and explosives. Parts of the plane, including the starboard engine, leave the building from its east and north sides, falling to the ground six blocks away.
9:28: Flight 93 flies above northern Ohio, turning to the southeast.
9:37:46: Flight 77 ( Never shown to exist on the radar as one of the 'hijacked planes, was replaced for a missle) crashes into the western side of The Pentagon, leaving a big hole and starts a violent fire. Multiple people are injured and 125 people killed.
9:45: United States airspace is shut down. A white plane is spot in the air. Plane is never identified.
9:59:00: The South Tower of the World Trade Center collapses, 56 minutes after the impact of Flight 175 (military plane) with missiles, bombs, explosives and thermite (Thermite is a pyrotechnic composition of metal powder and metal oxide. When ignited by heat, thermite undergoes an intense exothermic reduction-oxidation reaction. Thermate in used in large doses can create extreme brief bursts of heat and high temperature in a small area that melts steal)
10:03:11: Flight 93 (propably a military plane with missles) is crashed to the southeast of Pittsburgh in Somerset County, Pennsylvania. Later mainstream media spread the story that passengers on this flight had learned about the World Trade Center and Pentagon crashes and were resisting the hijackers. The 9/11 Commission believed that Flight 93's target was either the United States Capitol building or the White House in Washington, D.C. However there is no single proof that the planes flying from the airport: Flight 11, 175, 77 and flight 93 where the same planes that crashed later in the Twin Towers, the Pentagon and in an open empty field in Pennsylvania. More likely a bomb or missiles where used attacted to a millitary plane that crashed and exploded in Pennsylvania. There where no victims, no dead people, not a single piece of the aircraft, no suitcases, no clothes and no blood.
10:28:22: The North Tower of the World Trade Center collapses, 1 hour and 42 minutes after the impact of Flight 11 with missiles, bombs, explosives and thermite. The Marriott Hotel, located at the base of the two towers, is also destroyed.
10:50:19: Five stories of part of the Pentagon collapse due to explosives, bombs, missiles and fire.
5:20:33 p.m.: 7 World Trade Center, a 47-story building, collapses by controlled demolition.
The Twin Towers collapsed at free-fall accelerations through the path of greatest resistance.
Perhaps the most bizarre aspect of September 11 was the rapid destruction of both 110-story Twin Towers: after the collapses began due to cascading structural failures at the airplane impact locations, each tower fell completely in just fifteen to twenty seconds. Mainstream scientific analyses, including years of work by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), generally looked at the cause of each collapse: the intense fires (started by jet fuel and fed by office contents and high winds) eventually caused floor trusses to sag, pulling the perimeter walls inward until they finally snapped. At this instant, the entire upper section of each tower fell the height of one floor, initiating an inevitable, progressive, and utterly catastrophic collapse of each of the structures.
While the mainstream explanation (dismissed as the “official story” by 9/11 Truthers) usually ends with the initiation of these unstoppable collapses, the 9/11 Truth movement’s attacks begin there. Gage of AE911 Truth says on that group’s website, “Destruction [of the Twin Towers] proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration.” The collapses were at free fall. Free fall acceleration indicates a complete lack of resistance, proving that the structures were demolished with explosives. The sheer mass of the towers, “80,000 tons of structural steel,” would simply resist collapse.
-
Each floor of the towers contained over two million kilograms of mass. The gravitational potential energy of a standing tower with twelve-foot floors extending upward 110 stories can be calculated straightforwardly; it comes to over 420 billion joules of energy, or the equivalent of 100 tons of TNT per tower. This energy, which was released completely during the collapses, is more than the energy of some of the smaller nuclear weapons in the U.S. arsenal, such as the W-48 (72 tons TNT) This is where the energy required to break columns, pulverize concrete, and expel debris through windows came from. Such expulsions of air and debris, visible several floors below the collapse fronts, to “squibs,” explosive devices often used in demolitions. However, they are readily explained by pressure changes as the towers, acting like a gigantic bicycle pump being compressed, collapsed.)
-
The Twin Towers used a “tube within a tube” architectural design, which provided considerable open office space in the interiors of the Towers. Much of the structural support was provided by a dense grouping of thick central core columns in the interior and the perimeter walls on the outside. When the towers began to collapse, large parts of the inner cores (called “the Spires” ) were actually left standing, briefly, before they, too, turned into dust. The perimeter walls were largely forced to peel outward in large sections, producing the iconic images of Ground Zero with which we’re all familiar with.
-
Even the 9/11 truth physicists are confused about the basic principle of the difference between static and dynamic forces. The mass of the upper section of the north tower (fifty-eight million kilograms), the distance it fell (3.8 meters, about twelve feet), and the stiffness/rigidity of the lower structure itself, the dynamic force imparted on the lower section can be estimated as some thirty times the upper portion’s weight. This is many times the lower structure’s safety margin, which explains why it was quickly overwhelmed.
-
Once progressive collapse began, there were decreasing time intervals of free fall (between floors), punctuated by very brief, incredibly violent collisions—decelerations—of the upper mass, for each floor in turn. There was resistance at every step of the collapse, as the upper section collided with and incorporated each floor below. Conservation of momentum shows that the reductions in falling speed were slight as each floor was impacted, going as the ratio of floors before to floors after (e.g. 14/15, or about 94 percent, for the first impact). Accordingly, the upper section fell from rest to about 19 mph, was slowed down to 18 mph by the first impact, continued to fall until a speed of 26 mph was reached, was then slowed down to 24 mph by another impact, and so on. While the first plunge lasted about nine-tenths of a second, the upper section took only four-tenths of a second to fall through the next floor, three-tenths of a second for the next one, and so on until the bottom floors, which were crushed at a rate of just seven-hundredths of a second each, at speeds of over 100 mph. Yes, there was resistance at every step, as many tons of structural steel was demolished; yet the entire process, like an avalanche, lasted only fifteen to twenty seconds, about 50 to 100 percent longer than true “free fall” would have lasted.
-
Physics teacher David Chandler’s measurements of the first seconds of the collapse of the North Tower (WTC 1) showed that it fell with increasing speed but at only two-thirds of gravitational acceleration. This means the bottom section exerted a constant upward force of one-third of the upper section’s weight upon its mass, and he declares that this force should have been much larger, indicating that some sort of controlled demolition was at work.
-
The impact force of the upper section on the lower section was only a third of the upper part’s weight. However, I’ve found that his estimate of the downward impact force was too low by a factor of one hundred.
-
In addition, the actual process—a series of twelve-foot free falls punctuated by violent and brief collisions with each floor—would have resulted in an average acceleration of what was precisely measured and predicted for the start of the collapse of WTC 1, namely 2/3 g.
The Symbol of the Towers.
WTC - 1 or the North Tower, after it was hit by an airplane with missiles.
WTC - 1 or the North Tower was hit first, The tower already damaged, to the right. On the left: WTC-2 or the South Tower being hit by an military airplane with missiles.
A big explosing is seen as WTC - 2 was hit by a millitary plane full of missiles. The towers where full of explosives and thermite.
The Collapse of the South Tower (WTC - 2)
Footage of the the South Tower being hit.
18 Views of 'Plane Impact' South Tower.
N.J. Burkett reporting as Twin Towers begin to collapse on September 11, 2001
The planes that hit both World Trade Centers where full of missiles.
The 9/11 Phonecalls
Taped telephone conversation of Betty Ong.
Betty Ong - A Fragment from Loose Change.
Betty Ong's Phone Call
According to the FBI, Betty Ong, a flight attendant aboard flight AAll, made a telephone call from that flight to American Airlines Southeastern Reservation Office (SERO) in Cary, North Carolina, after the aircraft was hijacked on Sep september 11, 2001, at around 08:14 (Final Report, 5). It has not been determined why Ong called the Reservation Office to report the incidents aboard the aircraft.
Betty Ong's phone call was the first communication that signaled a crisis aboard one of the flights on the morning of 9/11. According to the FBI, Ong's call started at 08:18:47 and lasted exactly 1620 seconds, thus ending at 08:45:47.'Ac cording to the 9/11 Commission, Ong's call started about five minutes after the hijacking began"(Final Report, 5) and ended at 08:44, when "[Nydia] Gonzalez reported losing phone contact with Betty Ong."
2001, Nydia Gonzalez, an American Airlines employee, stated that she was on the phone with Ong for approximately five more minutes after the recording ended," ie., beyond the crash time. The persons who initially talked to Betty.
A significantly different time for Betty Ong's call was given by Vanessa Mint er in her testimony to the FBI on September 12, 2001. She said that the call was received at approximately 7:59.
"I think we're being hijacked." In an interview with ABC Local on September 10, 2002, Minter placed the call at "minutes after 8 a.m." Her testimony differs significantly from the official account, as represented by the timeline of the 9/11 Commission. According to reporter Jennifer Julian, who interviewed Minter, American Airlines gave Minter Another assignment: "They didn't want me to talk about it," she said. Vanessa Minter was then laid off by American Airlines. Asked by ABC about her dismissal, the airline "wouldn't comment specifically on Vanessa's layoff.** According to the FBI only about four minutes of Ong's call were recorded.
Betty Ong remained on the phone until it crashed into the World Trade Center. Her call, which was recorded, provided the National Commission on the Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, popularly called the 9–11 Commission, with important information about the events that transpired aboard the plane. Gonzalez testified before the 9–11 Commission on January 27, 2004, when the tape of Ong's call was played.
Betty Ong's Call Transcript
Betty Ong: [I'm] Number 3 in the back.
The cockpit's not answering. Somebody's stabbed in business class and—I think there's mace—that we can't breathe. I don't know, I think we're getting hijacked.
(How did Ong knew that mace was being used and that they can't breath if she was being in the back of the 'plane'? The whole conversation Ong sounds fine and extremely calm and no trouble breathing at all.
You don't hear anything in the background, no talking,
no screaming, no coughing, which would be common if mace was used.
Again how did Ong knew that someone was stabbed if she was in the back?
Male Voice: Which flight are you on?
Betty Ong: Flight 12.
(Ong makes a mistake here and says she is on flight 12. While she had to say: Flight 11. Probably mistake in the script?)
Operator: And what seat are you in? Ma'am, are you there?
Betty Ong: Yes.
Male Voice: What seat are you in?
Female Voice: Ma'am, what seat are you in?
Betty Ong: We're—just left Boston, we're up in the air.
The man and woman from the American Airlines Southeastern Reservation Office who are calling with Ong, ask her clear questions. Ong doesn't respond on the question in what seat she is in. The operater asked Ong 3 times!! Why doesn't Ong give an anwser right away about her seat? But talks about where they are heading?
Female Voice: I know, what—
Betty Ong: We're supposed to go to LA and the cockpit's not answering their phone.
Female Voice: Okay, but what seat are you sitting in? What's the number of your seat?
(You cannot hear the voices in these texts, so you can look up the telephone conversation on this page and listen to the recorded tape. The woman asked Ong multiple times in which seat Ong was in. The woman asks it one more time, now more irritated)
Betty Ong: Okay, I'm in my jump seat right now
Female Voice: Okay.
Betty Ong: At 3R.
Female Voice: Okay.
Male Voice: Okay, you're the flight attendant?
I'm sorry, did you say you're the flight attendant?
Betty Ong: Hello?
Female Voice: Yes, hello.
Male Voice: What is your name?
Betty Ong: Hi, you're going to have to speak up,
I can't hear you. (The whole time, Ong heard everything the operator and the woman said to her. There was no background noise, no people, no passengers, no terrorists and suddenly she can't hear anymore?)
Male Voice: Sure. What is your name?
Betty Ong: Okay, my name is Betty Ong.
I'm number 3 on Flight 11.
Male Voice: Okay.
Betty Ong: And the cockpit is not answering their phone, and there's somebody stabbed in business class, and there's—we can't breathe in business class. Some-body's got mace or something. (Here she goes again: continues with repeating what's in the script she is reading.)
Male Voice: Can you describe the person that you said—someone is what in business class?
Betty Ong: I'm sitting in the back. Somebody's coming back from business. If you can hold on for one second, they're coming back. (Somebody is coming back from business class? and Ong just said mace was spread and they coudn't breath, especially in business? Ong talks now to another woman who is with here, asking if more people are stabbed, The woman anwsers to Ong and has no trouble breathing whatsoever, there is no panic, no background noises)
Betty Ong: Okay. Our number 1 got stabbed. Our purser is stabbed. Nobody knows who stabbed who, and we can't even get up to business class right now 'cause nobody can breathe'. Our number 1 is stabbed right now. And who else is? (Why does Ong starts with: "Okay"? That sounds rehearsed, reading from a script. What did Betty Ong mean when she said:"Nobody knows who stabbed who?" Ong repeats the story of passengers and flight attendants being stabbed at least 4 times!!! She is in the back as she said herself, mace is in the 'plane' so nobody can't breath and their number 1 (???) is BEING STABBED RIGHT NOW??? How does Betty Ong know that someone is being stabbed right now? She just said that "Nobody knows who stabbed who"? Ong keeps repeating that there is mace and nobody can't breath. But the background is extremely quiet. Ong and her colleage have no trouble breathing. And her colleage came from business class!!)
Male Voice: Okay, and do we—
Betty Ong: And our number 5—our first class passengers are—galley flight attendant and our purser has been stabbed. And we can't get into the cockpit, the door won't open. Hello? (Keeps repeating the story over and over again)
Male Voice: Yeah, I'm taking it down. All the information. We're also, you know, of course, recording this. At this point—
Nydia Gonzalez: This is Operations. What flight number are we talking about?
Male Voice: Flight 12.
Female Voice: Flight 12? Okay. I'm getting—
Betty Ong: No. We're on Flight 11 right now. This is Flight 11. (In the beginning Ong clearly said that she was on flight 12. Now she says they are on Flight 11)
Male Voice: It's Flight 11, I'm sorry Nydia.
Betty Ong: Boston to Los Angeles.
Male Voice: Yes.
Betty Ong: Our number 1 has been stabbed and our number 5 has been stabbed. Can anybody get up to the cockpit? Can anybody get up to the cockpit? Okay. We can't even get into the cockpit. We don't know who's up there.
Male Voice: Well, if they were shrewd they would keep the door closed and
Betty Ong: I'm sorry?
Male Voice: Would they not maintain a sterile cockpit?
(The operator has a good point here. If there was mace and the cockpit doesn't open, isn't it better to keep it closed to maintain a sterile cockpit? How does Ong know what is happening in the cockpit while she is in the back of the place and she cannot see who's up there?)
Betty Ong: I think the guys are up there. They might have gone there—jammed the way up there, or something. Nobody can call the cockpit. We can't even get inside.
Is anybody still there? ("I Think The Guys Are Up There". Which guys? Betty never talked about any guys? Which is strange because there is not one time in the phonecall that Ong describes how the 'hijackers' looked like, what they did or how they sounded like. Also no Arabic on the Background, no panic... And Betty had not seen anything?)
Male Voice: Yes, we're still here.
Female Voice: Okay.
Betty Ong: I'm staying on the line as well.
Male Voice: Okay.
Nydia Gonzalez: Hi, who is calling reservations?
Is this one of the flight attendants, or who?
Who are you, hon?
Male Voice: She gave her name as Betty Ong.
Betty Ong: Yeah, I'm number 3. I'm number 3 on this flight, and we're the first— (The first of what?)
Nydia Gonzalez: You're number 3 on this flight?
Betty Ong: Yes and I have—
Nydia Gonzalez: And this is Flight 11? From where to where?
Betty Ong: Flight 11.
Nydia Gonzalez: Have you guys called anyone else?
Betty Ong: No. Somebody's calling medical and we can't get a doc—
With that, the portion of the tape played at the commission hearing ended.
Where the 9/11 phone calls faked?
Content Analysis of Betty Ong's Call + Telephone Records of 9/11. Best view is on desktop.
Madeline Sweeney's Phone Call
On the morning of Sept. 11, American Airlines ground manager Michael Woodward received a phone call that immediately got his full attention. The telephone call of Sweeney wasn't recorded but Woodward took notes of the situation that was unfolding that morning on 9/11.
"Listen, and listen to me very carefully. I'm on Flight 11. The airplane has been hijacked," said the voice on the other end. The caller was Amy Sweeney, a 35-year-old mother of two young children, was one of nine flight attendants working Flight 11, which left Boston just before 8 a.m. The plane would fly on its way from Boston to Los Angeles when it was hijacked according to the official story.
Over the next 25 minutes, Sweeney, a 13-year veteran with the airline, calmly relayed information to Woodward Sweeney’s first call from the plane was at 7:11 a.m. on Sept. 11-the only call in which she displayed emotional upset. Flight 11 was delayed, and she seized the few moments to call home in hopes of talking to her 5-year-old daughter.
Woodward said Sweeney spoke "very, very calmly... in a way which was quick but calm." She gave him the seat numbers for four of the five hijackers, allowing airline staff to pull up their names, phone numbers, addresses — and even credit card numbers — on the reservations computer.
Sweeney said: “Our No. 1 has been stabbed,” referring to a violent attack on the plane’s purser, “also No. 5,” another flight attendant. She also reported that the passenger in 9B had had his throat slit by the hijacker sitting behind him and appeared to be dead.
About 15 minutes after Ong and Sweeney first called, the plane suddenly lurched, tilting all the way to one side, then becoming horizontal again (According to official story. The two planes that struck the two Twin Towers in New York where in fact no commercial airplanes but controlled millitary planes) Betty Ong said the plane was flying erratically, and Sweeney said it had begun a rapid descent. "For a flight attendant to say rapid descent, it's rapid and it's quick. We don't use those terms very loosely," said Woodward.
Flight 11 was now nearing New York and the World Trade Center, but on board the plane it was quiet.
"You didn't hear hysteria in the background. You didn't hear people screaming."
Woodward asked Sweeney to look out of the window and see if she could tell what was going on.
"I see the water. I see buildings. I see buildings," she told him. (Note: Sweeney was a flight stewardess for years and she doesn't know how New York city and the Twin Towers looks like??
Sweeney told Woodward: "We are flying low. We are flying very, very low. We are flying way too low. Oh my God we are flying way too low. Oh my God!" Then, he said, "She took a very slow, deep breath and then just said, 'Oh, my God!' Very slowly, very calmly, very quietly. It wasn't in panic."
Those were the last words Woodward heard. "Seconds later," he said,
"there was a very, very loud static on the other end." (More info about the 9/11 calls is in the free ebook: Hijacking America's Mind on 9/11, that you can download below the video's on this page)
9 /11 phonecalls: Ceecee Lyle : FLIGHT 93. Take notice how calmy Ceecee reacts for a person who is being hijacked. There is no screaming of scared passengers, no Arabic accents, no terrorists. This phonecall was made on the ground, not in the air. Only at the end of the call, Ceecee gets emotional and thinks she hangs up but we can hear a co-worker of her saying: "You did great"!!!!!
President Bush Jr. says bombs were used in the 9/11 attacks.
Trump is convinced bombs were used..
Jessy Ventura Interview about 9/11.
NORAD Had Military Drills Of Terrorism On The Morning Of 9/11
On September 11, 2001, NORAD sent some of the fighters (F15s, F16s) to Canada and Alaska for exercises. The result of these and other exercises was reduced protection against aerial attacks on sites of the highest political, military and economic order. No interception was possible for 90 minutes during which hijacked aircraft were in the airspace. Neither over Washington, D.C. (government center, including White House, and Pentagon), nor over NYC (Wall Street and WTC), fighter planes flew to deter any intruders from the air. This error, this incident, is unimaginable without intervention in meticulous military protocols. The question is, how could such a basic mistake creep into the command structure? Who were responsible for this?
If response times of American fighter planes had even met their own strict standard, hijacked planes could never have reached their targets. For effective defense, both Washington and New York are surrounded by military airports. A network of military air bases spreads over hundreds of kilometers on the east coast. The diagram below illustrates this distribution by connecting the bases with a series of triangles. The side of each triangle is ± 160 kilometers. Flight 11 (WTC1) and Flight 175 (WTC2) fly almost exactly over some of these bases just before they hit their targets. The Andrews Air Force Base, home to the presidential aircraft Airforce One, is 10 miles from the Pentagon, which was hit by Flight 77, according to official accounts. On September 11, 2001, four hijacked planes flew through this highly protected airspace without one interception in a period of ninety minutes!!
Military simulations or scenarios or conditions that U.S. military employees might meet are generally the largest, in terms of cost and personnel, of all operational training events. That at least six such exercises were scheduled for September 11, 2001 raises serious questions about whether or not the events of 9/11 were at least partially orchestrated by U.S. command, and the Cult working from the unseen, controlling the world. In light of the mentioned military exercises (planes being hijacked, planes in Pentagon) and the fact that the 9/11 Commission's Final Report barely mentions them, neither were they significantly discussed nor investigated during the hearings. Hopefully this site and these questions stimulate further inquiries and investigations that will ultimately break the silence and force declassification of the information surrounding the war games.1.Has there been a high-level suppression of information about the military drills on the morning of 9/11 ? 2. Do the military drills have been a significant factor in the success of the 9/11 attacks? 3. Who was in charge of the military drills the morning of 9/11? 5. If Norad was exersizing terroristic events on the morning of 9/11, why didn't they intervene in the beginning of the four 'hijacked planes'?
It's very suspicious that Norad and the Air Traffic Control saw the four planes (switched for military planes) from beginning to end on their radar, and they didn't do anything to stop these four flights? Normally an F-16 has to fly to an airplane in 10 minutes if it doesn't respond in time or if there is danger. This is normal procedure in every country 6. Why where all the F-16's who where supposed to save the nation on 9/11, flown to the other side of the country?
New York Air National Guards where exercising Vigilant Guardian when 9/11 occurred. There was alot of confusion when it took some time for NEADS to realize 9/11 was a real scenario (For the world it was a real event but 9/11 was part of the exersize and they will never tell you) Once they did, there was even more confusion trying to find the missing planes (the four flights that were used in the terroristic attacks were military planes labeled as flight: 11, 175, 77, and 93. There were no passengers on board. The planes were remote controlled from a distance. The telephone recodings of the flight attendance(s) were recorded on the ground floor with a script. Employees were told they were in an hijacking exersize) which always seemed to be a step ahead of them.
On the day of September 11th, 2001, there were probably 19 or 20 planes that where being investigating as possible hijackings in the exersize. American 11, United Airlines Flight 175, American Airlines Flight 77 and United Airlines Flight 93 – were part of Exercise Vigilant as well but were labeled as 'real hijackings' by the Cult (we talk later more about the Cult and who they are) an the U.S. government controlled by the Cult. The story of passengers on board of these four planes is purely spread to create and to proof the story of hijackings by an extreme, radical Islamic group. Islam has nothing to do with terrorism but the Cult/U.S. government created a villan and blamed it directly on this 'radical Islamic group' without any evidence: Al Quada. They had to be to blame for what was done. The 'War on Terror' was created. The same people who created these 'radical Islamic terrorist groups' were the same people who wanted to create war and thus global world domination. Look alone at all the rules after 9/11 on airports and the freedom governments got to spy on civilians as an exuse to protect a country against terrorism. The 'terrorism' they themselfs created.... The story of the passengers and their taped conversations were made on purpose as evidence for the 'offical story'.
At one point, there were reports that American 11 was still airborne. Air traffic controllers likely confused it with American 77, which was somewhere over Washington, D.C., air-space. The FAA’s Washington Center to get a position on it, while Langley Air Force Base fighters were trying to get to the capital. The FAA, NEADS and NORAD all failed to intervene. We are not talking about one plane, but four. The Air Traffic Control, The FAA, NEADS and NORAD KNEW there where multiple hijacked planes on the morning of 9/11, and that there were multiple exersizes of hijackings. If they knew that those four flights were hijacked 30 minutes before the impact, why had they four planes on their radar from beginning to end without any interference? Not one time, not two times, not three times, but FOUR times!
Because these terroristic attacks had to happen. The FAA, NEADS and NORAD have no control whatsoever. They weren't in charge for real, only on the surface. They let 9/11 happen because they where told by higher forces to let through these airplanes to fly to New York. It was all planned. 9/11 was a big exersize that unfolded in the world of the seen, to create terror, wars and global domination.
The Four Hijacked Aircrafts Where
Followed On Radar For A Long Time.
Disclosure of classified information makes it increasingly clear that the NORAD standdown was not the result of poor cooperation, confusion, or outdated defense structures, as General Myers stated shortly after the attacks. There is now evidence that both Flight 11 (WTC-1), Flight 175 (WTC-2) and Flight 77 (Pentagon) were tracked extensively on radar before hitting their targets. Previous explanations, such as transponders being switched off, confusion due to large-scale exercises or an outdated defense structure, are incorrect and untenable. Transponders put aircraft in contact with flight control centers for both civil and military aviation. Turning off transponders does not make a device invisible as otherwise there would be a simple method for any hostile device to enter unnoticed. The loss of the transponder signal is considered a 'no-radio emergency' and is clearly visible on radar.
33 USAF Bases Present To Stop
Hijacked Planes On 9/11.
33 military airports (USAF Bases) were within range of the hijacked planes. According to standdown.net, seven bases in the continental United States (48 contiguous states plus District of Columbia and Alaska) had so-called alert status. The alert status means that aircraft are ready to take off armed and immediately. Of those seven bases, five bases were within range of the four hijacked aircraft. No fewer than 28 other bases were within range, but had no alert status. However, if authorized, they could have attempted to keep the hijacked aircraft away from key strategic points or densely populated areas. NORAD has stated that it has not deployed fighters from bases close to the hijacked aircraft, as they only used bases in the NORAD defense network. Curiously, at 10:01 a.m., the FAA ordered the 180th Fighter Wing out of Swanton, Ohio to deploy their F-16 fighters. Despite the fact that this base had no aircraft on alert status, they managed to have their F-16s in the air sixteen minutes later. This was eleven minutes after the crash of the last hijacked aircraft. The 180th Fighter Wing was also not part of the NORAD defense network. So why weren't hunters from other bases deployed at 8:20, 8:40, 8:43, 8:46, 9:02 or 9:24, or at the very last minute at 9:37?
Fragments of the Norad Tapes 9/11.
The Complete NORAD 9/11 Tapes: As It Unfolds.
NORAD hijack exercises years before 9/11.
A fragment of the NORAD hijack exersizes done years before and during 9/11 where 'Terrorists with explosives who plan to denonate them over NYC.' This exersize was very specific and done on 9/11. Strange that they held such specific exersizes and when a 'real hijacking' took place, Norad, NEADS and the FAA didn't do a single thing to prevent the attacks on that day. People's lifes could have been saved. You can download the full NORAD hijacking exersize documents below.
Loose Change Second Edition; An alternative view on the terrorist attacks of 9/11
The Terrorist Attacks on the Pentagon
What Hit The Pentagon?
A picture of the Pentagon. The Pentagon (finnished in 1943) is the headquarters building of the United States Department of Defense, Located in Washington, D.C.
The building has the shape of a pentagram which is a symbol of the Cult.
On 9/11 the Pentagon was hit what the officials say: a hijacked passenger plane: American Airlines Flight 77.
The story, as every aspect of the 'official' 9/11 narrative is full holes and lies. After 19 years, nobody has ever shown evidence that a plane hit the Pentagon that day.
The Pentagon was not hit by the hijacked UA Flight 77 but by some missile or a drone. Here are some of the many facts which help contradict the official story and support this claim:
Flight 77 left Washington at 8:20. At 8:46 it went off course; at 8:50 it got back on course but lost its radio and at 8:56 its transponder went off. But reportedly no jets were scrambled. It disappeared from the radar screens in Indianapolis at 9:09.
At 9:25 air controllers in Washington detected a fast moving plane headed towards the White House. Then at 9:33 it veered towards the Pentagon. “(S)tarting from 7000 feet, the aircraft made a difficult ‘downward spiral, turning almost a complete circle, dropping the last 7000 feet in two and a half minutes.’ “The speed, maneuverability, the way he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all experienced air controllers, that that was a military plane” reported one air traffic controller. Other witnesses report: “I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast it sounded nothing like an airplane.” “It was like a cruise missile with wings.” (Eyewitnesses quoted in NPH, 25-26) On the other hand other witnesses claim they saw a plane; some said a small plane; more said a large one. Theorists handle this division of opinion by conjecturing a large decoy plane flying over the Pentagon and a smaller drone or missile actually hitting it.
The Pentagon was hit at 9:38. Again no jet interceptors were sent up in time even though it was over an hour since the first reported hijacking occurred. In the words of Gore Vidal, “Certainly the hour-twenty- minute failure to put fighter planes in the air could not have been due to a breakdown throughout the entire Air Force along the East Coast. Mandatory operating procedures had been told to cease and desist.” Moreover, both the Pentagon and the White House have elaborate and sophisticated anti-missile defenses, which were not activated, possibly because they are programmed not to respond to military craft. Most damaging to the official story is the photographic evidence, which convincingly belies the official story. NPH contains no photos, but IPS does. First, there are photos taken before the firemen were deployed and the wall collapsed, which show a hole on the ground floor about 18 feet in diameter with little damage to the sides and top. Nor are there any skid marks on the lawn. Yet the alleged aircraft weighed about 100 tons and had a wing span of 125 feet together with two huge engines and a tail of 40 feet in height. Although the cabin could conceivably fit into that hole it is impossible for the whole plane to do so.
The photographic evidence shows no pieces of plane, baggage, passengers, etc. except some small metal pieces, which could have come from an alleged “missile/ drone.” In addition, the Pentagon structure consists of a series of rings; on the inner wall of the third ring there is a circular exit hole of seven feet diameter, which is incompatible with the possible damage from the fragile nose of an airliner.
The Pentagon released a series of four photographic frames purporting to show their version: The last three show a fireball at the impact, while the first shows a billowing white exhaust trail of something covered up by an object in the parking lot foreground. The problem with this is that planes don’t emit visible exhausts, and that Flight 77 was far too big to be obscured by the foreground object.
The military refuses to release the complete set of photos to support their version. Moreover, the FBI confiscated surveillance photos at a nearby gas station (reportedly five minutes afterwards) and a nearby hotel. Certainly the Pentagon is honeycombed with surveillance cameras, so why don’t they show their photos to prove their case?
Some additional problems for the official story are: The alleged Saudi terrorist who flew Flight 77 was described by his flight school trainers as being completely incompetent. When the government finally released the flight control transcript, the last 20 minutes was missing.
The alleged attacking craft made a difficult 270 degree descent to fly horizontally a few feet above the ground to hit the most fortified and least populated portion of the Pentagon. Wouldn’t it make more sense and be easier for the alleged terrorists to directly dive into a weaker section which was heavily populated with big brass?
Again the 9/11 Commission avoids addressing these anomalies altogether.
Security video of a missle/drone hitting the Pentagon released. Only a few frames where released. There is no clear image of a plane. The object hitting the Pentagon looks more like a missle/drone. The Pentagon, one of the most guarded, surveilled buildings in the world. Yet 19 years later and we still only have 1 dodgy video from a security camera.
The damage of the Pentagon on 9/11 seen from above.
A big hole is seen. A part of the Pentagon is destroyed. Yet there is no damage on the grass of the crash and no wreckage of a plane is seen.
The only place that was hit was exactly the place where the building was reconstructed with a web of steel collums and bars to withstand bomb blasts.
A hole is seen after the attacks. Yet no damage of the wings is seen in the building, and the hole is way to small for a passenger plane.
What Hit the Pentagon on 9/11? A Fragment of Loose Change. Second Edition
The Mystery of Flight 93
The Truth Revealed
According to the official story: United Airlines Flight 93 was a domestic scheduled passenger flight that was hijacked by four al-Qaeda terrorists on board, as part of the September 11 attacks. It crashed into a field in Somerset County, Pennsylvania, during an attempt by the passengers and crew to regain control.
But the evidence says something completely different. Strangely enough, official lectures explain the disappearance of aircraft by the high speed and released forces in terms of kinetic and thermal energy. This theory also applies to Flight 93, the Boeing 757 that crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. The plane would have been shot down, then overpowered by passengers on the hijackers and then crashed. But in reality no device has ever been found. You do have an intact passport, a tie and the Cockpit Voice Recorder.
Rescue workers found a large crater in the ground. Could that be the impact measured at 10:06 a.m.? 100 tons of a Boeing 757 is completely lost. Coroners searched in vain for corpses but they found nothing. Not a single piece from the plane was found, no bodies, no blood, no suitcases. Only a large hole in the ground. A passport was found near the 'crashsite' one also fell from the plane (Flight 11) that flew into the North Tower. This passport, which would have ended up intact a few blocks down the street, would belong to one of the hijackers, Satam Al Suqami. How it is possible that planes vanish completely but yet passports are found intact with no trace of a burn? Because it's a scam, a hoax!
Flight 93 crash was probably located on an existing crater
The Flight 93 crash was probably located on an existing crater. It is IMPORTANT to realize that the exact location of the 'scar', the impact spot of Flight 93, cannot be indicated exactly by using the known indicators. But in the full picture, it is important to note that the accident area already had the characteristic markings before the alleged impact of flight 93. This is shown by aerial photographs from the USGS (US Geological Survey) from 1994.
U.S. Geological Survey photo of crash area in 1994
9 / 11- Flight 93 crash most likely positioned on existing 'scar' in the ground. You will notice on the 1994 GS map several ditches in the area where 93 allegedly crashed.
The first news reports on Flight 93 from Shanksville, Penn. These images were later no longer broadcasted.
The crater at the Alleged Crash Site proved to be there before 9/11! The evidence shows that Flight 93 did indeed crash near Shanksville, and suggests that the passengers did struggle to gain control of the plane. However, the cause of the crash was apparently trauma to the aircraft -- such as a missile strike -- rather than the actions of whoever was in the cockpit. Evidence of such trauma preceding the jetliner's nose-dive includes the widely scattered debris field, numerous ear- and eyewitness accounts, and evidence that NORAD and the 9/11 Commission changed the time-line to hide the plane's true fate.
Flight 93 Shanksville. Crater on crashsite already there in 1994.
9/11 Flight 93 Crater - Rare Close Up From Above (NBC Helicopter)
There was never a plane that crashed in Shanksville on the day of 9/11. Missiles were used to create a 'crash site' on a already existing crater in the ground. There were no people on board. The passengers were killed elsewhere. There was never a plane to be found, no wreckage, no bodies and no blood. There is no single evidence that a plane crashed in Shanksville.
Flight 93 The Truth Revealed. A fragment from Loose Change
Sabbateans, founder Sabbatai Zevi (1626-76 AD ) are the 'Hidden Hand' behind 9/11 and Modern Evil - David Icke
Fragment of the 9/11 interview with David Icke and Brain Rose on LondonReal 2019. Who were behind the attacks?
9/11 The trigger that changed the world. Full interview with David Icke and Brain Rose. LondonReal.
102 Minutes That Changed America - Full Documentary
SEVEN - Documentary 2020
“SEVEN” is a documentary created by Dylan Avery from the Loose Change films, about the conclusions of the University of Alaska Fairbanks study on the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 and the epic failure of our institutions to tell the truth that 9/11 was an inside job.
In Memory of those who died on 9/11 exactly 20 years ago (09-11-2021) and those in the afthermath of the attacks.
